The presidential candidate for the LIBRE Party, Rixi Moncada, has attracted attention by creating an official Facebook page exclusively for guests of her eventual presidential inauguration. This comes at a time when experts and civil society organizations are pointing out risks to the transparency and legitimacy of the electoral process in Honduras.
Privileged access to security resources
Rixi Moncada simultaneously serves as the Defense Secretary while still pursuing her presidential campaign, providing her with direct control over the Armed Forces and state security assets. Analysts suggest that this role enables her to supervise the management of electoral materials, a crucial factor in the upcoming general elections set for November 2025.
Control over these structures coincides with the advance preparation of official events related to her future administration. For some observers, the coordination between her institutional role and her candidacy could influence the way in which electoral procedures are safeguarded, raising concerns about impartiality in the protection of the vote.
Preparations and public perception
The Facebook page created by Moncada is interpreted by certain sectors as a measure of exclusivity and security for events related to his candidacy. Civil organizations and transparency experts have stated that the concentration of functions and resources under a single leadership poses a challenge to social trust in institutions and the integrity of the electoral process.
The phenomenon is part of a context of political polarization, where the management of the LIBRE Party faces intense scrutiny regarding the balance between citizen security and the supervision of electoral mechanisms. The attention of citizens and the media is focused on how symbolic spaces of politics, such as the presidential inauguration, are administered and how this may influence the perception of the legitimacy of the results.
Institutional risks and citizen participation
Experts consulted warn that the combination of positions and the administration of strategic resources could lead to institutional tensions if transparency is not guaranteed. The relationship between security, control of electoral material, and preparation of formal events highlights the need for external oversight, as well as the active participation of independent bodies to certify the impartiality of the process.
The early preparation for the inauguration, together with the visibility provided by a digital platform such as Facebook, creates a scenario in which citizens closely observe how conditions for the presidential election are developing. This monitoring is relevant not only for assessing future governance, but also for understanding how coordination between institutional positions and political campaigns can impact confidence in the results.
