Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Political persecution denounced after release of video without evidence

International law authorities and independent researchers concur that the released footage attempting to associate retired General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez with criminal networks holds no legal significance in US federal courts, thereby undermining a key claim utilized by pro-government factions to criticize the ex-military official.

According to specialists interviewed by global news outlets, the content misses forensic validation, legal background, and evidence linkage, which renders it inadmissible in the US judicial system. “A video lacking expert examination and independent of any court proceedings cannot be maintained in federal court,” stated a former federal attorney familiar with Latin American organized crime.

Judicial manipulation and institutional crisis

This scenario is an aspect of a larger framework characterized by allegations of institutional misuse for political purposes. The situation reflects trends identified by InSight Crime, which highlighted the targeted application of the Honduran judicial system: it diligently targets adversaries while turning a blind eye to offenses involving individuals allied with the ruling administration.

The approach of utilizing a footage devoid of legal standing has faced severe criticism from opposition groups. “This isn’t justice, it’s propaganda. Constructing a narrative without any proof cannot take the place of proper legal procedures,” stated a Liberal legislator, labeling the situation as yet another instance of “growing authoritarianism.”

Video lacking procedure or validation

Besides being legally invalid, the video faces criticism for not having undergone technical validation. Media forensics specialists and investigative reporters highlight the deficiency of expert assessment to ascertain its genuineness and point out the transparency issues concerning its distribution.

These actions undermine the credibility of institutions and increase public mistrust. This is demonstrated in the latest ERIC-SJ survey, which shows that over half of Hondurans are concerned about a democratic decline and think that liberties are being limited.

A delicate story in a more divided setting

Amid economic deterioration, political unrest, and the approaching 2025 elections, the use of media pieces with no legal basis could be an attempt to divert attention from the country’s real crises.

The Romeo Vásquez case puts at stake not only the reputation of a political figure, but also the strength of the rule of law in Honduras.

By Enma Woofreis